Articles/ Blogs
Articles/ Blogs
Piyush Subhashbhai Ranipa v. State of Maharashtra, 2021 SCC OnLine Bom 350
Case Analysis: Piyush Subhashbhai Ranipa v. State of Maharashtra, 2021 SCC OnLine Bom 350 Facts of the case In a case where the complainant claimed that Mr. Piyush Subhasbhai Ranipa
Support for Start-up in protecting their Intellectual property
Start-up Intellectual Property Protection (SIPP) scheme was first launched in the year 2016 and is extended further till 2026 after witnessing the successful execution and growth
Trademark Infringement
MOONSHINE TECHNOLOGY (P) LTD. V. TICTOK SKILL GAMES (P) LTD. Any person who trespasses the rights conferred by registration of a trademark infringes the registered trademark for example by adopting
Eglo and Vossius’s infringement case.
Eglo and Vossius win fourth infringement case against Signify Austrian LED light manufacturer Eglo may continue to sell its LED lights in Germany, following a decision of the Regional Court
BlackBerry Vs Typo Products
It is quite often that we all think about why even the shape of bottles of various beverages differ from each other, why the manufacturer of Audi is not able
DM Entertainment v. Baby Gift House and Ors
DM Entertainment v. Baby Gift House and Ors. Daler Mehendi, the famous pop star from Punjab has a large fan base and is extremely popular amongst Punjabi pop music lovers.
Hermes vs Metabirkin
French luxury brand, Hermes, has finally filed a trademark to protect its name in the Web3 space, following a high-profile court case with Metabirkin NFT creator, Mason Rothschild, that started
Luka Doncic files petition for trademark control
Luka Doncic files petition for trademark control in legal conflict with mom While playing abroad in the EuroBasket championships and leading Slovenia to a win over hosts Germany, Dončić faced
Canon announces conclusion in patent infringement
Canon announces conclusion in patent infringement dispute in Russia Canon filed a patent infringement lawsuit with the Moscow Arbitration Court against the Russian entities asserting that defendants’ activity on introduction