The Bombay High Court has once again voiced its frustration regarding the ongoing issue of illegal hoardings and banners erected by political parties in public spaces. Despite multiple directives and undertakings, the disregard for the Court’s orders persists, prompting strong criticism of both political entities and municipal authorities.
In a recent Public Interest Litigation (PIL), a division bench comprising Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyay and Justice Amit Borkar took a firm stand against these violations. The Court expressed its displeasure at the inaction of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (BMC) and other municipal corporations, highlighting their failure to implement the Court’s previous orders.
Court’s Frustration with Political Disrespect for Orders
Chief Justice Upadhyay remarked on the blatant disregard shown by political parties toward judicial directions. He stated, “Despite all such orders having been passed… the directions issued by the Court appeared to have fallen on deaf ears of authorities.”
The Court had earlier cautioned political parties about adhering to the law and respecting its directives. However, the ongoing erection of illegal banners indicates that these warnings have gone unheeded.
BMC Under the Scanner
The richest municipal corporation in the country, the BMC, was singled out for its lack of action. During the hearing, the petitioners presented affidavits with photographs showing several illegal hoardings in Mumbai. Frustrated by the lack of enforcement, the Chief Justice questioned, “What is your commissioner doing?”
The Court has now directed the BMC’s counsel to inform the Municipal Commissioner about these violations and provide an explanation as to why no actions have been taken to address them.
Chief Minister’s Office Allegations
Adding a new dimension to the case, one of the counsel referred to an affidavit alleging that the Chief Minister’s office had instructed the BMC Commissioner, over two years ago, not to remove certain posters. The Court has sought assistance from Advocate General Birendra Sara to address this serious claim.
A Longstanding Battle
This case stems from a 2017 order in which the Bombay High Court issued stringent directives to municipal corporations, ward officers, and the police to curb the menace of illegal hoardings. The problem has persisted despite these efforts.
In October 2024, the Court revived the PIL and directed a special drive to remove illegal hoardings from public places, including streets and parks. However, during the hearing on November 18, 2024, the petitioners expressed concerns about a surge in illegal hoardings following the announcement of State Assembly election results.
To address these fears, the Court had directed the State government, District Police Heads, and the Director General of Police (DGP) to take proactive measures. The DGP was also instructed to deploy sufficient police forces to support municipal bodies in curbing illegal hoardings.
Looking Ahead
The Bombay High Court continues to hold municipal corporations and political parties accountable for their inaction in tackling the illegal hoarding crisis. Its strong stance and repeated directives aim to restore public spaces to their lawful use and ensure adherence to judicial orders.
This case—Suswarajya Foundation, Satara & Anr vs. The Collector, Satara & Anr (PIL/155/2011)—highlights the need for stricter enforcement mechanisms and greater respect for the law by all stakeholders.